3.0 KiB
ADDED Requirements
Requirement: Reference set is produced from Claude tiers
The benchmark SHALL produce a reusable reference set by dispatching one Claude Code subagent per Claude tier (claude-haiku-4-5, claude-sonnet-4-6, claude-opus-4-8) over the fixture notes, with each subagent's output written to a distinct per-model file.
Scenario: One reference file per model
- WHEN the benchmark prompt is run on the fixture set
- THEN a separate output file is produced for each of the three Claude tiers
- AND each file contains that tier's extraction result for every fixture note
Scenario: Opus output is the scoring rubric
- WHEN the reference set is reviewed
- THEN the
claude-opus-4-8output is treated as the gold-standard rubric against which the other tiers, and later the local Ollama models, are scored
Requirement: Dispatch prompt enforces a fairness contract
The benchmark prompt SHALL give each subagent only the raw note text and a shared minimal extraction spec, and SHALL forbid reading repository files or pulling project context.
Scenario: Minimal context per subagent
- WHEN a subagent is dispatched for a fixture note
- THEN its input is limited to the note text and the shared extraction spec
- AND it is explicitly instructed not to read
CLAUDE.md, design docs, or other project context
Requirement: Output conforms to the Graphify-shaped schema
Each subagent SHALL emit a structured fragment matching the shape Graphify produces — entities, typed relationships, and INFERRED/AMBIGUOUS confidence tags — so per-model outputs are diffable against each other and against later Ollama output.
Scenario: Schema embedded in the prompt
- WHEN the benchmark prompt is authored
- THEN the required output schema is embedded verbatim in the prompt
- AND every per-model output file follows that schema
Scenario: Outputs are diffable
- WHEN two per-model output files for the same fixture note are compared
- THEN they share a common structure that allows entity-by-entity and edge-by-edge comparison
Requirement: Claude reference run is scored on quality only
The Claude reference run SHALL be evaluated on extraction quality only — entity correctness, relationship plausibility and typing, and confidence-tag accuracy — and SHALL NOT use wall-clock speed as a metric.
Scenario: Speed excluded from the reference run
- WHEN the Claude reference run is evaluated
- THEN wall-clock time per note is not used as a metric
- AND speed is reintroduced only when local Ollama models are later benchmarked against the reference set
Requirement: Prompt is a committed, reusable file
The benchmark dispatch prompt SHALL be written as a committed file that can be copy/pasted into a Claude Code session to reproduce the run.
Scenario: Prompt persisted as a file
- WHEN the benchmark is set up
- THEN the dispatch prompt exists as a committed file in the repository
- AND running it does not require reconstructing the prompt from memory