Runner commit message on implementation_complete is the contract-auditor summary #987
Labels
No labels
P0
P1
P2
P3
bug
category/code-change
category/cross-repo
category/eval-run
category/investigation
category/no-test-target
category/owner-ruling
category/prose-artifact
category/recurring-chore
category/structure
category/umbrella
crc-refactor
create
delete
enhancement
filed-by/agent
filed-by/user
frozen
lint-rule
needs-info
needs-triage
next
plugin/cc-architect
plugin/os
plugin/os-adr
plugin/os-aidd-lint
plugin/os-backlog
plugin/os-context
plugin/os-doc-hygiene
plugin/os-sdlc
plugin/os-vault
project/cc-os
ready-for-agent
ready-for-human
recurring
review
rule-proposal
update
waiting
wayfinder:grilling
wayfinder:map
wayfinder:map
wayfinder:research
wayfinder:task
wayfinder:task
wontfix
worklist/deviations
worklist/lint-rule
worklist/new-implement-build
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set
Reference
jared/cc-os#987
Loading…
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Problem
On
implementation_complete, the Runner's commit message was the contract-auditor summary. It was not a change description.Observed message:
feat: Audited POODR boundaries for the API key redaction change; design and contracts hold, all four WORK items present. (#1)A person had to reword it by hand.
Expected
The commit message describes the change (from the ticket or the diff), not an auditor verdict.
Discoverer: n8n-api (/home/jared/dev/ruby-gems/n8n-api), session 6dc5405e-9eff-4c53-932c-eb5f2cf1165c, 2026-10-10. Runner commit message came from the auditor summary.
Resolution
Done: Mechanism: Implementation::Commit builds the commit from handoff items and the last handoff summary, not from the diff or the ticket. Occurrence: #1115 "Runner commit subject is the last handoff's summary, which is the contract-auditor's audit note". Note: the body of #1115 was a copy of #1111's body (behavior-verifier brief omits test_changes); only its title described the commit-subject defect.
Evidence: #1115 adds no new evidence beyond its title, which restates this defect: the commit subject is the last handoff's summary, i.e. the auditor's audit note.
Follow-ups: none