os-sdlc: reviewer output not persisted; verdict.md contract mismatch #363

Closed
opened 2026-08-14 15:20:28 +00:00 by jared · 3 comments
Owner

The reviewer agent never writes .sdlc/tickets//verdict.md, so the verdict gate reads 'missing' and review feedback is lost to the routed brief. Also two verdict grammars coexist: Runner::Verdict wants bare APPROVE first line; artifact-era ReviewerVerdict wants APPROVE. Found during ticket #351 (reviewer findings had to be relayed by hand; APPROVE parsed as invalid).

The reviewer agent never writes .sdlc/tickets/<id>/verdict.md, so the verdict gate reads 'missing' and review feedback is lost to the routed brief. Also two verdict grammars coexist: Runner::Verdict wants bare APPROVE first line; artifact-era ReviewerVerdict wants **APPROVE**. Found during ticket #351 (reviewer findings had to be relayed by hand; **APPROVE** parsed as invalid).
Author
Owner

Decision: reviewer writes .sdlc/tickets//verdict.md directly, first line bare APPROVE/REQUEST-CHANGES; artifact record_reviewer_verdict path retired as reviewer output. reviewer.md prompt updated; #361 pipeline run will exercise it. Map route review->test-writer split to a separate ticket.

Decision: reviewer writes .sdlc/tickets/<id>/verdict.md directly, first line bare APPROVE/REQUEST-CHANGES; artifact record_reviewer_verdict path retired as reviewer output. reviewer.md prompt updated; #361 pipeline run will exercise it. Map route review->test-writer split to a separate ticket.
Author
Owner

Frozen in the 2026-08-16 backlog reset — see #419 for the expiry procedure. Do not work unless a live run rediscovers this issue.

Frozen in the 2026-08-16 backlog reset — see #419 for the expiry procedure. Do not work unless a live run rediscovers this issue.
Author
Owner

Resolution

Done: Sweep 2026-10-10 (ruled 2026-10-12): problem absent or no longer applies. Current reviewer card: verdict is pass/fail/error in the stop message; 'The stop message is the only handoff; the router reads it, not a file.' Contradicts the ticket's verdict.md claim.

Evidence: docs/takedown/363-20261010-111318 : Current reviewer card: verdict is pass/fail/error in the stop message; 'The stop message is the only handoff; the router reads it, not a file.' Contradicts the ticket's verdict.md claim.

Follow-ups: none

## Resolution **Done:** Sweep 2026-10-10 (ruled 2026-10-12): problem absent or no longer applies. Current reviewer card: verdict is pass/fail/error in the stop message; 'The stop message is the only handoff; the router reads it, not a file.' Contradicts the ticket's verdict.md claim. **Evidence:** docs/takedown/363-20261010-111318 : Current reviewer card: verdict is pass/fail/error in the stop message; 'The stop message is the only handoff; the router reads it, not a file.' Contradicts the ticket's verdict.md claim. **Follow-ups:** none
jared closed this issue 2026-10-12 13:40:22 +00:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set

Reference
jared/cc-os#363
No description provided.