SecondBrain/os-orchestration-eval-basel...

113 lines
6.5 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

---
type: eval-results
title: os-orchestration E1E3 baseline grid (headless orchestration behavior)
summary: Negatives clean 18/18 on both tiers (zero over-delegation, zero false downgrade claims) and the cluster-1 self-report + cluster-2 explicit-model rules work whenever spawns occur — but positives fail 1/18 on the delegate-at-all axis, and transcript verification shows most of those FAILs are superior direct strategies (scripted bulk edits, surgical greps) the criterion wrongly punishes, not misses. Criterion redesign pre-registered before any rescore.
tags:
- type/eval-results
- domain/llm-evaluation
- tool/os-orchestration
- project/cc-os
scope: global
last_updated: 2026-07-06
date: 2026-07-06
related:
- eval-methodology-ladder
- eval-methodology-irl-feedback-loop
- running-autoresearch-skill-evals
- os-adr-eval-c-frozen-grid-results
source: cc-os
---
# os-orchestration E1E3 baseline grid
## Results Grid/Threshold
**Passing criterion:** per-cell ≥2/3 reps PASS. Positives require the cluster behavior
(E1P: non-haiku spawn + downgrade flagged; E2P: delegation with explicit `model:` on every
spawn; E3P: delegation with pre-spawn bytes ≤15KB and no dual-read). Negatives FAIL only on
over-triggering (any spawn on trivial/orienting work; false downgrade claim).
Grid 2026-07-06, run-set × {sonnet, haiku} × 3 reps (36 reps, all counted, zero harness
ERRORs) + 2 counted E1P-sonnet canary reps. Raw TSV:
`cc-os/plugins/os-orchestration/eval/results/2026-07-06-baseline-grid.tsv`.
| Cell | sonnet | haiku |
|---|---|---|
| E1P (downgrade detection) | FAIL 1/3 | FAIL 0/3 |
| E1N (no false claim) | PASS 3/3 | PASS 3/3 |
| E2P (explicit-model fan-out) | FAIL 0/3 | FAIL 0/3 |
| E2N (no spawn on trivial) | PASS 3/3 | PASS 3/3 |
| E3P (delegate investigation) | FAIL 0/3 | FAIL 0/3 |
| E3N (orienting reads direct) | PASS 3/3 | PASS 3/3 |
**Summary:** all 6 negative cells PASS on both tiers; all 6 positive cells fail the
delegate-at-all axis (models overwhelmingly work direct in headless mode). The conditional
rules are validated wherever spawns occurred: 14/14 spawns across the grid carried explicit
`model:`, and the one E1P rep that delegated (sonnet r2, 6 spawns) flagged the stubbed
downgrade mechanically (`B:pass-mechanical`, 6/6 mismatches surfaced via self-report).
## Measurement Setup
**Hypotheses / Scenarios Tested** — one paired positive/negative per verified WS1 audit
cluster (`docs/orchestration-audit/2026-07-06-findings.md`): E1 = cluster 1 (silent model
downgrade; runner stubs `CLAUDE_CODE_SUBAGENT_MODEL=haiku` on E1P only, identical task text
on E1N), E2 = cluster 2 (omitted `model:` param), E3 = cluster 3 (self-investigate then
delegate the same ground). E4 deferred by design.
**Fixture and Sampling** — new Node.js "relaystation" fixture (distinct from eval-b Ruby and
eval-c Python), ~400KB deterministic sandbox-time logs, single-occurrence doc plants.
3 reps/cell for baseline discovery. Headless-only (`claude -p`, cwd = sandbox, real
SessionStart injection — verified present in transcripts).
**Experimental Control (Frozen Surfaces)** — scenarios, checker, judge rubric frozen;
reserve set (6 twins) frozen and untouched. ORCHESTRATION.md wording is the declared tuning
surface. Two pre-grid canary reps (both counted): rep 1 falsified the audit's premise that
`resolvedModel` is model-visible in the launch result (it is harness-metadata only) → the
cluster-1 rule was reworded to subagent model self-report (subagents know their exact model
ID — verified live) with instruments untouched; rep 2 confirmed harness soundness.
## Validity and Limitations
**How to Interpret These Results** — this is the untuned baseline for the 2026-07-06 wording
(the production audit is the pre-wording baseline). Negatives: strong — the
trigger-conditioned wording causes zero over-delegation and zero false claims. Positives:
the A-axis numbers overstate the miss. Transcript verification splits the FAILs into
(a) **superior direct strategies** — E2P sonnet solved 9 files with one scripted bulk edit
(3 calls, 3.7KB), E3P sonnet root-caused via surgical greps (2645KB of a 400KB corpus, never
reading whole logs) — behavior the WS1 auditors themselves scored as justified
non-delegation; and (b) **genuine miss shapes** — E3P haiku Read whole 112KB log files into
its own context; E2P haiku did a 20-call per-file grind. The criterion conflates the two.
**Weaknesses of This Eval** — the delegate-at-all axis punishes instruction-superior
behavior (a conformance defect of the criterion, cousin of the eval-c positive-axis defect,
caught here by transcript verification after the grid instead of by canary). Fixture scale
is too small to force delegation for E1P (3 modules × ~60 lines review directly in-session
is defensible). Headless-vs-interactive population gap: the audit found delegation common in
real interactive sessions; headless `-p` may be a different behavioral population — external
validity unresolved. Single fixture. E1P/E1N haiku asymmetry (0/3 vs 3/3 delegation on
identical task text) unexplained at n=3.
## Deployment and Evolution
**Good-Enough Gate** — the shipped wording is safe to keep deployed: it causes no
over-triggering, and its conditional rules (explicit model, self-report downgrade flag)
work whenever engaged. The delegate-at-all gap is NOT cleared, but do not tune wording
against these A-axes until the criterion redesign lands — most A-FAILs are not misses.
**Hardening Path / Next Measurement** — pre-registered BEFORE any rescore or re-run (to
avoid fitting thresholds to observed results): E2P v2 should PASS a coordinated scripted
edit (zero spawns, task verifiably complete, fewer edit operations than target files) and
FAIL per-file grinds and implicit-model spawns; E3P v2 should score orchestrator context
ingestion (bytes into own window vs delegated) rather than spawn-count, with the budget
anchored to an independent source (e.g. the audit's S7 74KB exemplar), not to this grid's
numbers; E1P needs a fixture large enough that direct review is unreasonable. Reserve set
remains the clean measurement set. Deterministic env-override detection
(CLAUDE_CODE_SUBAGENT_MODEL) moved to WS3's status-check plugin — not a model behavior.
## Related
- [[eval-methodology-ladder]] — pass bars, paired scenarios, conformance dry-run discipline
- [[eval-methodology-irl-feedback-loop]] — the audit→scenario pipeline this eval instantiates
- [[running-autoresearch-skill-evals]] — canary/rep/rescore rules followed here
- [[os-adr-eval-c-frozen-grid-results]] — the sibling eval whose conformance-defect lesson recurred here