Addendum — the rule-report requirement, sharpened
The report requirement recorded above ("plain-language, example-grounded") is not sufficient on its own, per @jared: examples prove the…
Resolution
Calibration project #1 = cc-os.
Chosen to prove the protocol works before testing whether it generalizes. The self-referential risk is accepted knowingly: cc-os is the…
Correction to the resolution above — provenance fix (decision unchanged, rationale strengthened).
The comment above said *"ADR-017 already assigns ownership of .graphifyignore to…
Schema amendment (from #44): the propagate_ignore field is dropped. #44 resolved that a lifecycle rule never writes into another tool's ignore surface (separation of concerns; `.graphifyi…
RESOLUTION: No ignore-surface propagation. os-doc-hygiene stays in its own lane — separation of concerns.
Decision: A lifecycle rule never writes into any other tool's ignore/config…
CONSTRAINTS from #43 (Decide deletion confirm-gates and temporary-tier durations), two things :calibrate must carry:
- DETERMINISM-PROMOTION NUDGE (new design principle, mechanics are yours). #43…
ADR INPUTS from #43 (Decide deletion confirm-gates and temporary-tier durations) — three additions to this ticket's ADR set, alongside the already-flagged repo-root-dotfile-vs-.cc-os/ ADR from…
CONSTRAINT from #43 (Decide deletion confirm-gates and temporary-tier durations): the ignore surface is an explicit list, NOT an inference from .gitignore. #43 established that gitignored !=…
RESOLUTION: Deletion autonomy tiers, gates, and temporary-tier retention locked.
1. Rule-backed deletes are auto (no per-run prompt). A rule confirmed per #39 is the standing consent;…