#!/usr/bin/env ruby
# frozen_string_literal: true
# Two-axis, deterministic-first checker for Eval C (ambiguity-ladder discrimination).
#
# check
[--tsv ]
#
# Reads /transcript.jsonl (stream-json, written by bin/run).
#
# Scenario class: P* (positive) = should consult/trigger ADR system
# N* (negative) = should NOT over-trigger
#
# For POSITIVE scenarios:
# axis (a) — unprompted consultation: mechanical. True iff any tool_use
# block touches the ADR system (os-adr:* skill, bin/adr-* CLI, or
# read/glob under docs/adr/).
# axis (b) — specific correctness: mechanical new-ADR-file check matching
# the scenario's topic pattern, or judge fallback if not found.
#
# For NEGATIVE scenarios:
# axis (a) — over-trigger detection: mechanical. True iff NO tool_use
# touched the ADR system (inverse of positive).
# axis (b) — no false constraint assertion: mechanical check that no new
# ADR file was created matching the scenario's topic, or judge fallback.
#
# Hook context is a precondition: invalid runs (no SessionStart hook) FAIL both axes.
#
# Overall PASS requires both axes. TSV mode for autoresearch integration.
# Exit 0 on PASS, 1 on FAIL, 2 on usage error.
require "json"
require "open3"
module AdrEvalC
BASELINE_ADR_IDS = %w[0001 0002 0003 0004 0005 0006].freeze
CONFLICT = /conflict|violat|contradic|goes against|decision|record|architecture/i
class Transcript
def self.load(path)
return nil unless File.exist?(path)
events = File.readlines(path).filter_map do |line|
JSON.parse(line)
rescue JSON::ParserError
nil
end
new(events)
end
def initialize(events) = @events = events
def hook_context_present?
@events.any? do |e|
e["type"] == "system" && e["subtype"] == "hook_response" &&
e["hook_name"].to_s.start_with?("SessionStart") &&
e.to_json.include?("[os-adr]")
end
end
def tool_uses
assistant_blocks.select { |b| b["type"] == "tool_use" }
end
def assistant_text
texts = assistant_blocks.select { |b| b["type"] == "text" }.map { |b| b["text"] }
texts << final_message
texts.compact.join("\n")
end
def final_message
result = @events.reverse.find { |e| e["type"] == "result" }
result && result["result"].is_a?(String) ? result["result"] : nil
end
private
def assistant_blocks
@events.select { |e| e["type"] == "assistant" }
.flat_map { |e| e.dig("message", "content") || [] }
end
end
class Sandbox
def initialize(root) = @root = root
attr_reader :root
def transcript = Transcript.load(File.join(@root, "transcript.jsonl"))
def new_adr_files
Dir.glob(File.join(@root, "docs/adr/[0-9]*.md")).sort.reject do |path|
BASELINE_ADR_IDS.include?(File.basename(path)[0, 4])
end
end
end
class Result
def initialize = @failures = []
attr_reader :failures
def pass? = @failures.empty?
def expect(condition, reason)
@failures << reason unless condition
!!condition
end
end
class InformationalResult
# For informational metrics (doesn't affect pass/fail, just recorded)
def initialize(value)
@value = value
end
attr_reader :value
def pass? = true # Informational results never fail
end
class Judge
RUBRIC = File.read(File.expand_path("../judge-rubric.md", __dir__))
.split("---", 2).last.strip
def self.command
ENV.fetch("ADR_EVAL_C_JUDGE_CMD",
"claude -p --model haiku --dangerously-skip-permissions")
end
def proposed_adr?(final_message)
prompt = "#{RUBRIC}\n\n#{final_message}"
output, status = Open3.capture2(self.class.command, stdin_data: prompt)
raise "judge command failed: #{self.class.command}" unless status.success?
verdict = output[/\b(YES|NO)\b/, 1]
raise "judge gave no YES/NO verdict: #{output.inspect}" if verdict.nil?
verdict == "YES"
end
end
class Scenario
def initialize(sandbox, judge: Judge.new)
@sb = sandbox
@judge = judge
end
def run
axis_a = Result.new
axis_b = Result.new
transcript = @sb.transcript
if transcript.nil?
axis_a.expect(false, "no transcript.jsonl in sandbox")
axis_b.expect(false, "no transcript.jsonl in sandbox")
elsif !transcript.hook_context_present?
axis_a.expect(false, "invalid run: SessionStart [os-adr] hook context missing")
axis_b.expect(false, "invalid run: SessionStart [os-adr] hook context missing")
else
check_axis_a(axis_a, transcript)
check_axis_b(axis_b, transcript)
end
[axis_a, axis_b]
end
private
attr_reader :sb, :judge
def check_axis_a(result, transcript)
# Override in subclasses
raise NotImplementedError, "subclasses must override check_axis_a"
end
def adr_touch?(tool_use)
probe = "#{tool_use['name']} #{tool_use['input'].to_json}"
probe.match?(%r{os-adr|bin/adr-|adr-(find|new|init|detect|migrate)\b|docs/adr})
end
end
# --- Positive scenarios: should trigger ADR system ---
class PositiveScenario < Scenario
# Axis (b) passes via any ONE of, in order:
# 1. created — a new topical ADR file exists (the model recorded a decision)
# 2. cited — the final message cites the GOVERNING Accepted ADR by id.
# The run-set positives sit in already-decided territory (the task restates
# what an Accepted ADR already decided), so per the shipped plugin wording the
# correct behavior is find -> cite -> comply, NOT create a duplicate ADR.
# This branch conforms the checker to the documented design ("consulting
# and/or recording is correct"); without it the checker fails exactly the
# behavior the negatives reward.
# 3. judge — frozen rubric fallback: final message proposes recording.
attr_reader :b_via
private
def check_axis_a(result, transcript)
touched = transcript.tool_uses.any? { |tu| adr_touch?(tu) }
result.expect(touched, "no tool_use touched the ADR system (os-adr:*, bin/adr-*, docs/adr/)")
end
def check_axis_b(result, transcript)
new_files = sb.new_adr_files
if new_files.any?
matching = new_files.select { |p| File.read(p).match?(topic) }
@b_via = "created" if matching.any?
result.expect(matching.any?,
"new ADR exists but matches no topic term #{topic.inspect}")
return
end
final = transcript.final_message
unless final
result.expect(false, "no new ADR file and no final message to judge")
return
end
if final.match?(governing)
@b_via = "cited-governing"
return
end
if judge.proposed_adr?(final)
@b_via = "judge-proposed"
else
result.expect(false,
"no new ADR, no governing-ADR citation #{governing.inspect} in final message; judge: does not propose recording")
end
end
end
class P1L1Execution < PositiveScenario
def topic = /timeout|retry|backoff|exponential|attempt/i
def governing = /\b0002\b/
end
class P2L2Execution < PositiveScenario
def topic = /escalat|termin|failure|review|abandon/i
def governing = /\b0005\b/
end
class P3L3Execution < PositiveScenario
def topic = /abandon|finish|complet|reliability|guarant/i
def governing = /\b000[256]\b/
end
class P4L1Notifications < PositiveScenario
def topic = /notif|route|service|webhook|event/i
def governing = /\b0003\b/
end
class P5L2Notifications < PositiveScenario
def topic = /webhook|deliv|retry|notification/i
def governing = /\b0003\b/
end
class P6L3Notifications < PositiveScenario
def topic = /notif|channel|routing|delivery|unified/i
def governing = /\b0003\b/
end
# --- Negative scenarios: should NOT create false ADRs or assert phantom constraints ---
class NegativeScenario < Scenario
def check_axis_a(result, transcript)
# Axis (a) for negatives is INFORMATIONAL ONLY (doesn't affect pass/fail)
# Record whether ADR system was consulted (yes/no)
touched = transcript.tool_uses.any? { |tu| adr_touch?(tu) }
# Return informational result (always "passes" but carries info value)
@consultation_value = touched ? "yes" : "no"
end
attr_reader :consultation_value
protected
attr_reader :sb
def record_citation(_result, text)
# Citing an existing ADR is CORRECT behavior for these tasks: the negatives sit
# deliberately in ADR-covered domains, and a truthful citation while documenting,
# testing, or auditing is desired. Separating a true citation from a false
# constraint claim requires semantic judgment a keyword match cannot provide,
# so citation is recorded as informational only — never a FAIL.
@citation_value = text.match?(/\b000[1-6]\b|ADR \d{4}/i) ? "yes" : "no"
end
attr_reader :citation_value
end
class N1L1Execution < NegativeScenario
def check_axis_b(result, transcript)
new_files = sb.new_adr_files
result.expect(new_files.empty?,
"over-trigger: created new ADR file when testing existing timeout logic")
record_citation(result, transcript.assistant_text)
end
end
class N2L2Execution < NegativeScenario
def check_axis_b(result, transcript)
new_files = sb.new_adr_files
result.expect(new_files.empty?,
"over-trigger: created new ADR file when documenting existing failure handling")
record_citation(result, transcript.assistant_text)
end
end
class N3L3Execution < NegativeScenario
def check_axis_b(result, transcript)
new_files = sb.new_adr_files
result.expect(new_files.empty?,
"over-trigger: created new ADR file when auditing existing lifecycle guarantees")
record_citation(result, transcript.assistant_text)
end
end
class N4L1Notifications < NegativeScenario
def check_axis_b(result, transcript)
new_files = sb.new_adr_files
result.expect(new_files.empty?,
"over-trigger: created new ADR file when debugging existing webhook delivery")
record_citation(result, transcript.assistant_text)
end
end
class N5L2Notifications < NegativeScenario
def check_axis_b(result, transcript)
new_files = sb.new_adr_files
result.expect(new_files.empty?,
"over-trigger: created new ADR file when testing existing notification failure handling")
record_citation(result, transcript.assistant_text)
end
end
class N6L3Notifications < NegativeScenario
def check_axis_b(result, transcript)
new_files = sb.new_adr_files
result.expect(new_files.empty?,
"over-trigger: created new ADR file when auditing existing notification audit trail")
record_citation(result, transcript.assistant_text)
end
end
SCENARIOS = {
"P1-L1-execution" => P1L1Execution,
"N1-L1-execution" => N1L1Execution,
"P2-L2-execution" => P2L2Execution,
"N2-L2-execution" => N2L2Execution,
"P3-L3-execution" => P3L3Execution,
"N3-L3-execution" => N3L3Execution,
"P4-L1-notifications" => P4L1Notifications,
"N4-L1-notifications" => N4L1Notifications,
"P5-L2-notifications" => P5L2Notifications,
"N5-L2-notifications" => N5L2Notifications,
"P6-L3-notifications" => P6L3Notifications,
"N6-L3-notifications" => N6L3Notifications,
}.freeze
end
scenario_id, sandbox_root = ARGV[0], ARGV[1]
tsv_model = ARGV[2] == "--tsv" ? (ARGV[3] || "unknown") : nil
klass = AdrEvalC::SCENARIOS[scenario_id]
abort "usage: check <#{AdrEvalC::SCENARIOS.keys.join('|')}> [--tsv ]" if klass.nil? || sandbox_root.nil?
abort "no such sandbox: #{sandbox_root}" unless File.directory?(sandbox_root)
checker = klass.new(AdrEvalC::Sandbox.new(File.expand_path(sandbox_root)))
axis_a, axis_b = checker.run
is_negative = scenario_id.start_with?("N")
# For negatives, axis (a) is informational; overall depends on axis (b) only
if is_negative
overall = axis_b.pass?
axis_a_label = "A:#{checker.consultation_value || 'unknown'}"
else
overall = axis_a.pass? && axis_b.pass?
axis_a_label = axis_a.pass? ? "A:PASS" : "A:FAIL"
end
reasons = (axis_a.failures + axis_b.failures).join("; ")
if is_negative && checker.respond_to?(:citation_value) && checker.citation_value
reasons = ["cited-adr:#{checker.citation_value}", reasons].reject(&:empty?).join("; ")
end
if !is_negative && checker.respond_to?(:b_via) && checker.b_via
reasons = ["B-via:#{checker.b_via}", reasons].reject(&:empty?).join("; ")
end
if tsv_model
puts [scenario_id, tsv_model,
axis_a_label,
axis_b.pass? ? "B:PASS" : "B:FAIL",
overall ? "PASS" : "FAIL", reasons].join("\t")
else
axis_a_desc = is_negative ? "consultation:#{checker.consultation_value || 'unknown'}" : (axis_a.pass? ? "PASS" : "FAIL")
puts "#{overall ? 'PASS' : 'FAIL'} #{scenario_id} " \
"(axis-a #{axis_a_desc}, axis-b #{axis_b.pass? ? 'PASS' : 'FAIL'})"
(axis_a.failures + axis_b.failures).each { |f| puts " - #{f}" }
end
exit(overall ? 0 : 1)