three map nodes under-enrich relative to their charters (programmer in coding.yaml, contract-auditor and test-reviewer in poodr-implementation.yaml) #684
Labels
No labels
P0
P1
P2
P3
bug
category/code-change
category/cross-repo
category/eval-run
category/investigation
category/no-test-target
category/owner-ruling
category/prose-artifact
category/recurring-chore
category/structure
category/umbrella
crc-refactor
create
delete
enhancement
filed-by/agent
filed-by/user
frozen
lint-rule
needs-info
needs-triage
next
plugin/cc-architect
plugin/os
plugin/os-adr
plugin/os-aidd-lint
plugin/os-backlog
plugin/os-context
plugin/os-doc-hygiene
plugin/os-sdlc
plugin/os-vault
project/cc-os
ready-for-agent
ready-for-human
recurring
review
rule-proposal
update
waiting
wayfinder:grilling
wayfinder:map
wayfinder:map
wayfinder:research
wayfinder:task
wayfinder:task
wontfix
worklist/deviations
worklist/lint-rule
worklist/new-implement-build
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set
Reference
jared/cc-os#684
Loading…
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Problem
The #676 audit compared enrich lists to charters looking for excess. It also found the reverse in three nodes, where the charter reads a fact the map never supplies:
[ticket_brief]; programmer.md:16-20 lists seam-designer, change-auditor, test diff, and test files as inputs.[ticket_brief, gate_results]; contract-auditor.md:15 checks the diff against every WORK item in the change-auditor work list.[ticket_brief, red_tests, test_changes]; test-reviewer.md:16 reasons about WORK items and retired_tests.In each case the role either fails the charter rule silently or relies on the handoff field by luck.
Reproduce
n/a: design audit finding, not a runtime defect.
Approach
Per node, decide whether the map or the charter is right, and change one of them. coding.yaml has no change-auditor or seam-designer nodes, so the programmer charter must state those inputs as conditional. The two poodr-implementation nodes likely need the same enrich entries their poodr-ticket-implementation twins carry.
Required work:
Evidence
#676 audit notes on programmer, contract-auditor, and test-reviewer rows.
Origin
Skeptic verdict: CREATE (os-backlog:ticket-skeptic, session 9434289b, citations verified).
Resolution
Done: programmer charter marks map-provided inputs conditional; contract-auditor and test-reviewer enrich change-auditor in poodr-implementation.yaml
Evidence: shipped in commit
d15b8119(#691)Follow-ups: none