Lens proposal: A12 Report branches on suite.free_text? (decision-model #5) #1305
Labels
No labels
P0
P1
P2
P3
bug
category/code-change
category/cross-repo
category/eval-run
category/investigation
category/no-test-target
category/owner-ruling
category/prose-artifact
category/recurring-chore
category/structure
category/umbrella
crc-refactor
create
delete
enhancement
filed-by/agent
filed-by/user
frozen
lint-rule
needs-info
needs-triage
next
plugin/cc-architect
plugin/os
plugin/os-adr
plugin/os-aidd-lint
plugin/os-backlog
plugin/os-context
plugin/os-doc-hygiene
plugin/os-sdlc
plugin/os-vault
project/cc-os
ready-for-agent
ready-for-human
recurring
review
rule-proposal
update
waiting
wayfinder:grilling
wayfinder:map
wayfinder:map
wayfinder:research
wayfinder:task
wayfinder:task
wontfix
worklist/deviations
worklist/lint-rule
worklist/new-implement-build
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set
Reference
jared/cc-os#1305
Loading…
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
LENS line
LENS: A12 broken at lib/decision/model/evaluation/report.rb:20 - BREAKS: Report reads suite.free_text? and branches for rule_standings; JUSTIFIED: yes, a shared mode object costs more than one branch with two modes; PROPOSAL: NONE.
Challenge verdict
Code defect found. An A12-compliant design needs one Suite method that returns scores per rule, not a mode object. Suite already owns the mode (suite.rb:33-50 has seven free_text? branches). The five earlier A12 signals were also code.
Discoverer: /home/jared/dev/ruby-gems/decision-model, session b6d48eed-a394-4b5d-ac38-c8bee60b0902, 2026-10-23. LENS line from an os-sdlc run, challenged against the code.