Eval B wording reached 8/8 (sonnet) / 7/8 (haiku) on its run-set
after five iterations; subsequent W3 stability testing confirmed
intermittent flicker but acceptable performance. As Eval B is now
contaminated by iteration, we need a held-out measurement set to
assess generalization to new projects and cues.
Eval C measures whether learned behavior generalizes across
decreasing cue explicitness (explicit → moderate → conceptual
framing) and, critically, whether the model correctly avoids
false positives (over-triggering) when no Accepted ADR is in play.
Six paired scenarios (positive/negative at each level) run against
a job-execution domain fixture; a frozen reserve-set (notifications
domain) becomes the measurement set if anyone tunes wording against
the run-set.
New: `plugins/os-adr/eval-c/` — bin/ (run/check/self-test/sandbox
scripts), fixture/ (taskq async job queue, 6 ADRs, trigger-phrased
CLAUDE.md), scenarios/ (6 run-set), scenarios-reserve/ (6 reserve-
set), README.md (measurement discipline + design), judge-rubric.md.
Model-free self-test passing. First real grid run is a pending
decision.
jared