SecondBrain/backlog-system-options-rese...

---
summary: Research on self-hosted, AI-CRUDable kanban/backlog systems (2026-07) — Storybloq, Planka, Vikunja, Plane, Backlog.md, beads, Obsidian Bases kanban — with comparative verdicts for a solo freelancer running Claude Code + SecondBrain vault
tags:
  - scope/global
  - type/reference
  - domain/task-management
  - tool/claude-code
  - project/cc-os
last_reviewed: 2026-07-06
---

# Backlog system options research (2026-07-06)

Research question: a personal, cross-project backlog with (a) a visual kanban dashboard, (b) full AI CRUD (Claude Code), (c) self-hosted, (d) modular/low-maintenance, (e) multi-domain — software dev, freelance client management, business development, property management, general projects. Researched via three parallel sonnet subagents (web research; claims below not all hands-on-verified — see caveats).

Decision + pilot plan: [[vault-backlog-pilot-plan]].

## Requirements that emerged during framing (not in the original ask)

- **Recurrence is first-class**, not an afterthought: property maintenance (winterize spigots, HVAC/electrical/plumbing checkups via Woodfin) is date-driven, and a kanban alone doesn't do it.
- **ADHD constraint is load-bearing**: out of sight = forgotten. A board that must be opened, or a hook that fires only when a session starts, does not by itself surface anything. The system needs a push/surfacing layer (this became the central finding of the perspectives review — see [[vault-backlog-pilot-plan]]).
- **P0–P3 priority + effort metadata** for a morning "most important + quick wins" view; `someday` status that backgrounds items without deleting them.
- **Fifth-backlog trap**: Forgejo issues, OpenSpec changes, build-plan docs, and vault open-items already exist. A new system must consolidate the "where did we leave off" question, not add another place to check.

## Options evaluated

### Storybloq (github.com/Storybloq/storybloq) — inspiration, not a fit

Cross-session context persistence for AI coding: `.story/` dir of plain JSON + markdown (tickets/phases/notes/lessons/handovers), git-tracked, no server. 53 MCP tools + full CLI parity + importable TS library. v1.5.0 (2026-07-05), ~2.5 months old, 653 stars, 2 contributors, PolyForm Shield license (source-available, not OSI).

Disqualifiers: the kanban dashboard is a **Mac App Store app** (Linux user — the visual requirement is unmet); per-repo and coding-session-continuity focused (overlaps memsearch + journal hooks, ignores non-code domains); young; repo-scoped, against the global-capture direction (ADR-015 era).

Worth stealing: file-per-entity storage, handover-document concept, board-watches-files-live pattern, MCP tool surface breadth.

### Hosted self-hosted PM tools

- **Planka** — best of the hosted class. Trello-grade UI (~12K stars), lightweight Docker deploy, board-per-domain, AGPL. Key differentiator: **5+ community MCP servers** (mgertz/mcp-planka, bradrisse/kanban-mcp, etc.) giving Claude Code full CRUD with zero integration work. Named fallback if the markdown-native route fails.
- **Vikunja** — strongest horizontal PM design (projects as top-level units, custom fields, kanban/gantt/table views, documented REST API), v2.0 2026, but no CLI/MCP — hand-wired REST only. Heavier deploy (Go + MariaDB).
- **Plane** — Linear-class, first-party MCP server, workspace-level cross-project views, 49K stars. Built for team sprints/velocity; overkill + heaviest ops for a solo user. Good SWE-team option, wrong scale here.
- **Forgejo project boards** (existing infra) — weaker than hoped: repo-scoped (can't span domains), `tea` CLI does **not** cleanly expose board CRUD, board API underdocumented. Fine as the code-level tracker (issues), not as the portfolio board.
- **Kanboard** (maintenance mode, 2013 UX, no AI path), **Focalboard** (abandoned standalone, June 2024), **Huly** (no API/CLI/MCP found), **Taiga** (successor limbo), **OpenProject** (enterprise-heavy), **WeKan** (no advantage over Planka) — all ruled out.
- **Notion / Airtable / Linear** — fail self-hosting outright.

Structural cost of any hosted tool: backlog items live outside markdown — no wikilinks to how-to notes, no Graphify edges, no memsearch adjacency, a second source of truth. The Notion rental-property pattern (item note referencing contractor/how-to notes) is exactly what a DB-backed kanban can't express.

### Markdown / agent-native

- **Backlog.md (MrLesk/Backlog.md)** — best standalone agent-native tracker. Tasks as markdown+YAML files, agent-first deterministic CLI, web + TUI kanban, user-level `~/.backlog/<slug>/` workspaces spanning repos. 5.8K stars, MIT, active. Cost: a second markdown store outside the vault with its own schema. Devil's-advocate correction: Obsidian wikilinks **do** resolve into its files, so the "no wikilinks" dismissal was overstated — it is the primary fallback and the design template for the CLI ergonomics (`backlog task create "..."`).
- **beads (steveyegge/beads)** — 18.7K stars, git-backed issues with dependency DAG, MCP support, excellent for code work but repo-centric and code-marketed; wrong shape for property/client domains.
- **vibe-kanban (BloopAI)** — multi-agent orchestration kanban; post-commercial transition (Bloop shutdown 2026-04) = maintenance risk; orchestration-focused, not general PM.
- **kanban-md, agent-kanban, taskmd, VS Code Agent Kanban** — smaller/younger variants of the same file-per-task + YAML pattern; confirm the pattern is the 2026 consensus for AI-agent task tracking, none clearly beats Backlog.md.

### Obsidian-native (the chosen lane)

- **Obsidian Bases + board plugins** (Base Board by mderazon; obsidian-bases-kanban by xiwcx; Kanban Bases View) — kanban views over note **frontmatter**: columns map to a property (e.g., `status`), drag-drop writes back to frontmatter. Actively maintained 2026, built on the Bases custom-view API (~May 2026). Each card = a normal vault note → wikilinks, facets, Graphify, memsearch all apply. **Caveats (unverified hands-on):** multi-property filtering, ordinal sort (P0–P3 must not sort lexically wrong), drag-write reliability, and mobile rendering (custom Bases views are a known mobile weak spot — expect desktop-only) all need a spike before commitment.
- **mgmeyers obsidian-kanban** — de facto unmaintained; stores board state in markdown lists (fragile for external edits). Skip.
- **TaskNotes / obsidian-pm** — same note-per-task + frontmatter pattern with their own view layers; alternatives if Bases board plugins disappoint but a plugin dependency remains either way.
- **Tasks + Dataview** — good read-only reporting layer, weak for agent-driven mutation; not a primary store.

## Comparative verdict

Vault-native (task-type notes + Bases board views + thin deterministic CLI) wins on every axis except maturity-of-dashboard: one system instead of a fifth backlog, matches the proven Notion property pattern verbatim, items become graph nodes wikilinked to how-tos, AI CRUD is nearly free via existing os-vault plugin machinery, self-hosted/synced by construction. **Fallback #1: Backlog.md** (if the Bases board spike fails). **Fallback #2: Planka + community MCP** (if markdown-native fails altogether or a standalone web/mobile dashboard becomes a hard requirement). Forgejo issues remain the code-execution tracker underneath, referenced from vault tasks.

The perspectives panel (devils-advocate, simplifier, implementer, premortem) materially reordered the build — push/surfacing layer first, board second, CLI minimal — see [[vault-backlog-pilot-plan]] for the verdict and the plan.
-												vault: session notes 2026-07-06

											
										
										
											2026-07-06 16:38:51 +00:00
+								---
 								summary: Research on self-hosted, AI-CRUDable kanban/backlog systems (2026-07) — Storybloq, Planka, Vikunja, Plane, Backlog.md, beads, Obsidian Bases kanban — with comparative verdicts for a solo freelancer running Claude Code + SecondBrain vault
 								tags:
 								  - scope/global
 								  - type/reference
 								  - domain/task-management
 								  - tool/claude-code
 								  - project/cc-os
 								last_reviewed: 2026-07-06
 								---
 								# Backlog system options research (2026-07-06)
 								Research question: a personal, cross-project backlog with (a) a visual kanban dashboard, (b) full AI CRUD (Claude Code), (c) self-hosted, (d) modular/low-maintenance, (e) multi-domain — software dev, freelance client management, business development, property management, general projects. Researched via three parallel sonnet subagents (web research; claims below not all hands-on-verified — see caveats).
 								Decision + pilot plan: [[vault-backlog-pilot-plan]].
 								## Requirements that emerged during framing (not in the original ask)
 								- **Recurrence is first-class**, not an afterthought: property maintenance (winterize spigots, HVAC/electrical/plumbing checkups via Woodfin) is date-driven, and a kanban alone doesn't do it.
 								- **ADHD constraint is load-bearing**: out of sight = forgotten. A board that must be opened, or a hook that fires only when a session starts, does not by itself surface anything. The system needs a push/surfacing layer (this became the central finding of the perspectives review — see [[vault-backlog-pilot-plan]]).
 								- **P0–P3 priority + effort metadata** for a morning "most important + quick wins" view; `someday` status that backgrounds items without deleting them.
 								- **Fifth-backlog trap**: Forgejo issues, OpenSpec changes, build-plan docs, and vault open-items already exist. A new system must consolidate the "where did we leave off" question, not add another place to check.
 								## Options evaluated
 								### Storybloq (github.com/Storybloq/storybloq) — inspiration, not a fit
 								Cross-session context persistence for AI coding: `.story/` dir of plain JSON + markdown (tickets/phases/notes/lessons/handovers), git-tracked, no server. 53 MCP tools + full CLI parity + importable TS library. v1.5.0 (2026-07-05), ~2.5 months old, 653 stars, 2 contributors, PolyForm Shield license (source-available, not OSI).
 								Disqualifiers: the kanban dashboard is a **Mac App Store app** (Linux user — the visual requirement is unmet); per-repo and coding-session-continuity focused (overlaps memsearch + journal hooks, ignores non-code domains); young; repo-scoped, against the global-capture direction (ADR-015 era).
 								Worth stealing: file-per-entity storage, handover-document concept, board-watches-files-live pattern, MCP tool surface breadth.
 								### Hosted self-hosted PM tools
 								- **Planka** — best of the hosted class. Trello-grade UI (~12K stars), lightweight Docker deploy, board-per-domain, AGPL. Key differentiator: **5+ community MCP servers** (mgertz/mcp-planka, bradrisse/kanban-mcp, etc.) giving Claude Code full CRUD with zero integration work. Named fallback if the markdown-native route fails.
 								- **Vikunja** — strongest horizontal PM design (projects as top-level units, custom fields, kanban/gantt/table views, documented REST API), v2.0 2026, but no CLI/MCP — hand-wired REST only. Heavier deploy (Go + MariaDB).
 								- **Plane** — Linear-class, first-party MCP server, workspace-level cross-project views, 49K stars. Built for team sprints/velocity; overkill + heaviest ops for a solo user. Good SWE-team option, wrong scale here.
 								- **Forgejo project boards** (existing infra) — weaker than hoped: repo-scoped (can't span domains), `tea` CLI does **not** cleanly expose board CRUD, board API underdocumented. Fine as the code-level tracker (issues), not as the portfolio board.
 								- **Kanboard** (maintenance mode, 2013 UX, no AI path), **Focalboard** (abandoned standalone, June 2024), **Huly** (no API/CLI/MCP found), **Taiga** (successor limbo), **OpenProject** (enterprise-heavy), **WeKan** (no advantage over Planka) — all ruled out.
 								- **Notion / Airtable / Linear** — fail self-hosting outright.
 								Structural cost of any hosted tool: backlog items live outside markdown — no wikilinks to how-to notes, no Graphify edges, no memsearch adjacency, a second source of truth. The Notion rental-property pattern (item note referencing contractor/how-to notes) is exactly what a DB-backed kanban can't express.
 								### Markdown / agent-native
 								- **Backlog.md (MrLesk/Backlog.md)** — best standalone agent-native tracker. Tasks as markdown+YAML files, agent-first deterministic CLI, web + TUI kanban, user-level `~/.backlog/<slug>/` workspaces spanning repos. 5.8K stars, MIT, active. Cost: a second markdown store outside the vault with its own schema. Devil's-advocate correction: Obsidian wikilinks **do** resolve into its files, so the "no wikilinks" dismissal was overstated — it is the primary fallback and the design template for the CLI ergonomics (`backlog task create "..."`).
 								- **beads (steveyegge/beads)** — 18.7K stars, git-backed issues with dependency DAG, MCP support, excellent for code work but repo-centric and code-marketed; wrong shape for property/client domains.
 								- **vibe-kanban (BloopAI)** — multi-agent orchestration kanban; post-commercial transition (Bloop shutdown 2026-04) = maintenance risk; orchestration-focused, not general PM.
 								- **kanban-md, agent-kanban, taskmd, VS Code Agent Kanban** — smaller/younger variants of the same file-per-task + YAML pattern; confirm the pattern is the 2026 consensus for AI-agent task tracking, none clearly beats Backlog.md.
 								### Obsidian-native (the chosen lane)
 								- **Obsidian Bases + board plugins** (Base Board by mderazon; obsidian-bases-kanban by xiwcx; Kanban Bases View) — kanban views over note **frontmatter**: columns map to a property (e.g., `status`), drag-drop writes back to frontmatter. Actively maintained 2026, built on the Bases custom-view API (~May 2026). Each card = a normal vault note → wikilinks, facets, Graphify, memsearch all apply. **Caveats (unverified hands-on):** multi-property filtering, ordinal sort (P0–P3 must not sort lexically wrong), drag-write reliability, and mobile rendering (custom Bases views are a known mobile weak spot — expect desktop-only) all need a spike before commitment.
 								- **mgmeyers obsidian-kanban** — de facto unmaintained; stores board state in markdown lists (fragile for external edits). Skip.
 								- **TaskNotes / obsidian-pm** — same note-per-task + frontmatter pattern with their own view layers; alternatives if Bases board plugins disappoint but a plugin dependency remains either way.
 								- **Tasks + Dataview** — good read-only reporting layer, weak for agent-driven mutation; not a primary store.
 								## Comparative verdict
 								Vault-native (task-type notes + Bases board views + thin deterministic CLI) wins on every axis except maturity-of-dashboard: one system instead of a fifth backlog, matches the proven Notion property pattern verbatim, items become graph nodes wikilinked to how-tos, AI CRUD is nearly free via existing os-vault plugin machinery, self-hosted/synced by construction. **Fallback #1: Backlog.md** (if the Bases board spike fails). **Fallback #2: Planka + community MCP** (if markdown-native fails altogether or a standalone web/mobile dashboard becomes a hard requirement). Forgejo issues remain the code-execution tracker underneath, referenced from vault tasks.
 								The perspectives panel (devils-advocate, simplifier, implementer, premortem) materially reordered the build — push/surfacing layer first, board second, CLI minimal — see [[vault-backlog-pilot-plan]] for the verdict and the plan.